NEW DELHI, 16 Jan: Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has written to Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud for inclusion of government nominees in the collegium system on appointments to the higher judiciary and defended it as a “precise follow-up action” suggested by the apex court while striking down the NJAC Act.
Rijiju’s early January letter to the CJI and the remarks on Monday come amid a tug-of-war between the government and the judiciary over the process of appointments of judges to the Supreme Court and high courts.
Besides several union ministers, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has slammed the 2015 scrapping of the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) by the apex court and claimed that the judiciary was encroaching on the domain of the legislature.
The opposition, however, hit out at the move, with Congress leader Jairam Ramesh saying that, while reforms are needed, the government’s remedy is a “poison pill” for the independent judiciary. It also alleged that it was an “orchestrated confrontation” by the government to “capture” the judiciary.
Officials said the law minister has sought the setting up of a “search and evaluation committee” with representation from the central and the state governments in the selection of judges for the Supreme Court and the high courts, respectively.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal dubbed the government’s move “extremely dangerous.”
“There should be absolutely no government interference in judicial appointments,” Kejriwal said on Twitter.
Reacting to the Delhi chief minister’s remarks, Rijiju said the move is in line with the direction of the Constitution bench to restructure the MoP (Memorandum of Procedure) of the collegium system.
“I hope you honour court’s direction. This is precise follow-up action of the direction of the Supreme Court Constitution bench while striking down the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act. The SC Constitution bench had directed to restructure the MoP of the collegium system,” the minister said on Twitter.
“The contents in the letter to hon’ble CJI are exactly in conformity with the observations and directions of the Supreme Court Constitution bench. Convenient politics is not advisable, especially in the name of judiciary. Constitution of India is supreme and nobody is above it,” Rijiju said.
Congress leader Ramesh alleged that the government is seeking “complete subservience.”
“The VP’s assaults. The law minister’s attacks. All this is orchestrated confrontation with the judiciary to intimidate and thereafter capture it totally. The collegium needs reform. But what this government wants is complete subservience. It’s remedy is a poison pill for the judiciary,” Congress leader Ramesh said.
In November last year, Rijiju had said that the collegium system of making judicial appointments was “alien” to the Constitution.
A parliamentary panel too had expressed surprise that the government and the Supreme Court Collegium have failed to arrive at a consensus on the MoP, guiding the appointment, elevation and transfer of apex court and high court judges, even after almost seven years.
In October 2015, a five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court declared the NJAC Act, passed unanimously by Parliament, for appointing judges as unconstitutional on several counts.
The bench, headed by the then CJI JS Khehar, asserted: “In the matter of appointment of judges to the higher judiciary, as also in the matter of their transfer, the primacy in the decision-making process inevitably rests with the chief justice of India.”
In December 2015, the Supreme Court bench said that the views of the Centre and states should be taken into account, and asked the government to prepare a MoP in consultation with the CJI to enable transparency in the collegium system of appointment of judges.
It also asked the Centre to take into consideration suggestions on issues of eligibility, transparency, setting up the secretariat for the appointment of judges, redressal of complaints and other issues in the MoP on the appointment of judges.
In its report in the last session of Parliament, the department-related Standing Committee on Law and Justice and Personnel said it expects the government and the judiciary to finalise the revised MoP, “which is more efficient and transparent,” in terms of a Supreme Court observation.
“The committee is surprised to note that the Supreme Court and the government have failed to reach a consensus on the revision of the MoP for appointment of judges to the constitutional courts (SC and the 25 HCs), though the same is under consideration of both for about seven years now,” the panel headed by veteran BJP leader Sushil Kumar Modi said. (PTI)
