Editor,
The recent protests organised by the Arunachal Christian Forum (ACF), demanding complete repeal of the Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act (APFRA), 1978, have drawn widespread attention. While their concerns and grievances deserve sympathy and a fair hearing, the way in which certain individuals expressed their dissent is deeply concerning. A protest should be a platform for meaningful dialogue and constructive debate, not for spreading communal animosity or issuing threats against religious institutions.
The APFRA, enacted in 1978, was framed in a very different socio-political environment. Over the decades, society has undergone significant changes, and laws must evolve accordingly. If the ACF believes that the Act is discriminatory, its demand for its repeal should be addressed through proper channels. The government has, in fact, already extended an invitation for discussions, bringing together all stakeholders to deliberate the matter. The ACF should utilise this opportunity to convey its concerns in a structured and lawful manner, rather than allowing the movement to be overshadowed by divisive rhetoric.
What is most troubling is the hate speech and inflammatory remarks made during the protests. Mocking religious beliefs and issuing threats to destroy religious buildings are completely unacceptable in any democratic setup. It is also disturbing that such remarks were met with applause and approval from sections of the crowd. This not only damages the credibility of the movement but also risks inciting further discord between communities. If the real goal is the repeal of the APFRA, then the discussion must remain focused on the merits and drawbacks of the law, rather than descending into communal provocation.
As a responsible organisation representing its community, the ACF must ensure that its platform is not misused for spreading hatred. It should actively discourage and condemn such speeches, making it clear that its fight is against a law, not against any religion or community. At the same time, the government must take firm action against those engaging in hate speech while also remaining open to reviewing the Act in light of present-day realities.
Arunachal Pradesh has long been a state known for communal harmony and peaceful coexistence. Legal reforms should be pursued through reasoned argument and constructive dialogue, not through hostility and division. The ACF must engage with the government in good faith, ensuring that its concerns are addressed through lawful and democratic means. The way forward lies in open discussions and policy debates, not in fuelling tensions that threaten the very fabric of social unity.
A concerned citizen