Editor,
Through the columns of your esteemed daily, I would like to express my views regarding the ongoing debate around the district-wise quota (DWQ) policy in Arunachal Pradesh, especially in light of the recent writ petition challenging its validity.
Arunachal, as we know, is marked by significant developmental imbalances. While some districts have historically enjoyed better access to education and administrative services, others continue to struggle with inadequate infrastructure and limited opportunities. For aspirants from underdeveloped regions like Kurung Kumey, Dibang Valley, and Longding, this creates a structural disadvantage in open competition.
The district-wise quota policy was introduced to address these disparities by ensuring equitable representation in public employment, especially in Group C and D posts. It is not about providing unfair advantage, but about recognising and correcting regional imbalances in access to opportunity.
Legally, the policy is grounded in Article 16(4) of the Indian Constitution, which empowers the state to make provisions for underrepresented and backward groups in public services. In the context of Arunachal’s unique demography and tribal diversity, DWQ is both a lawful and logical measure.
Moreover, the policy also serves a social purpose. In a state where each tribe takes pride in its identity and progress, skewed representation can lead to resentment and social disharmony. DWQ, therefore, helps foster inclusiveness, unity, and equal participation from all corners of the state.
While the matter is currently under judicial review, it is important that we view the DWQ policy in its true spirit – not as a divisive measure, but as a step towards fair and balanced development. I sincerely hope that the original intention behind this policy is upheld in the greater interest of social equity and the state’s unity.
A concerned citizen