Editor,
I wish to draw attention to a matter of growing concern among aspirants regarding the non-adherence to the examination calendar by the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission.
It is deeply disheartening to observe that the commission continues to deviate from its own prescribed schedule. The very purpose of publishing an annual examination calendar is to ensure transparency, predictability, and adequate preparation time for candidates. However, repeated delays undermine this objective and create uncertainty among aspirants.
In particular, the recent recruitment process for the post of assistant professor highlights this issue. As per the notified calendar, the interviews were scheduled to be conducted in April 2026. Yet, we are already midway through the month, and the list of eligible candidates has not been released. Moreover, there has been no official communication or clarification from the commission regarding this delay. Such lack of timely updates only adds to the anxiety and confusion faced by candidates.
It is also pertinent to note that the assistant professor recruitment process does not involve a written examination, which already makes the process more susceptible to public scrutiny and scepticism. In such a context, any delay in the timely conduct of the selection process further fuels speculation regarding mismanagement and undermines public confidence in the fairness and transparency of the system.
These delays are not merely administrative lapses; they have real and tangible consequences. Many aspirants reside in rented accommodations or paying guest facilities, often sustained by their families’ hard-earned income. Prolonged uncertainty imposes both emotional stress and financial strain, particularly on those from modest backgrounds who struggle to meet basic expenses while preparing for these examinations.
Furthermore, repeated deviations from the announced schedule risk eroding the credibility of the commission and weakening the trust that aspirants place in such institutions. A fair and efficient recruitment process is essential not only for the candidates but also for maintaining the integrity of public institutions.
In light of the above, I humbly urge the commission to adhere strictly to its published calendar or, at the very least, ensure timely communication in case of unavoidable delays. Such measures would go a long way in restoring confidence and providing much-needed clarity to aspirants.
Serious aspirant