NEW DELHI/BEIJING, 14 May: India on Wednesday outrightly rejected as “vain and preposterous” China renaming some places in Arunachal Pradesh and said such attempts will not alter the “undeniable” reality that the state “was, is, and will” always remain an integral part of India.
New Delhi’s reaction came in response to Beijing announcing Chinese names for 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh, including 15 mountains, four passes, two rivers, a lake and five inhabited areas.
China claims Arunachal Pradesh as part of southern Tibet.
“We have noticed that China has persisted with its vain and preposterous attempts to name places in the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh,” External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said.
“Consistent with our principled position, we reject such attempts categorically,” he said.
Jaiswal was responding to a media query on the issue.
“Creative naming will not alter the undeniable reality that Arunachal Pradesh was, is, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India,” he said.
It was the fifth time China has renamed places in Arunachal Pradesh.
Hours after India’s reaction to Beijing releasing the 27 new names, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian argued that the move is within China’s “sovereign rights.”
“The Chinese government has standardised the names of some parts of Zangnan. This is within China’s sovereign rights,” he said.
Zangan is the Chinese name for Arunachal Pradesh.
In April last year too, India had reacted sharply when Beijing released a list of standardised names of 30 places in Arunachal Pradesh.
The Chinese Civil Affairs Ministry released the first list of the standardised names of six places in Zangnan in 2017, while the second list of 15 places was issued in 2021 followed by another list with names for 11 places in 2023.
Beijing’s decision comes amid efforts by the two countries to normalise ties hit by the more than four-year-long border standoff in eastern Ladakh along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
Soon after, the X account handles of Global Times and Xinhua on Wednesday showed that it has been withheld in India in response to a legal request. It was soon available.
