Editor,
There are a few unanswered questions and doubts regarding the recent AES 2025 recruitment that need to be addressed by APPSC for the benefit of the aspirants and their parents.
Q1. Segregation of candidates without prior notification or addendum, and changing the exam rules once advertisement was issued. Is it correct?
Q2. When all the civil engineering candidates are eligible for all the 7 departments, how can you disqualify a few without prior intimation?
Q3. In spite of repeated requests from the aspirants to look into the matter, considering press outrage, memorandum to HCM and HEG of AP, how could you overlook it? Why is your grievance redressal cell only on paper?
Q4. After the historic judgement from the high court, you could not conduct exam in 2 days, and are now fixing the exam date on 28 and 29 September and providing a timeframe of 15-20 days for the newly added candidates. Is it sufficient?
Q5. Why was the former secretary transferred on the day of the judgement?
Q6. Should you only consider timely completion of exams? Where is equality, fairness and level playing field for the aspirants?
Why is the commission, with the UPSC passed secretary, a professor, an ex-Army officer, and other highly qualified and experienced members, so adamant and egoistic? Where are your ethics, morality, sense of responsibility and humanity?
It’s not only thousands of aspirants, it’s thousands of parents, families and friends who are connected and affected.
The APPSC should be held accountable and it is answerable to all the aspirants and parents.
Thank you for the mess that you have created.
A double-list qualified AES 2025 aspirant