Editor,
This is in continuation of the concerns recently raised regarding the absence of a notified syllabus and examination pattern for the posts of finance & accounts officer (FAO) and sub-treasury officer (STO) under the Common Group A & B (Technical) Examination conducted by the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC).
Competitive examinations, especially those conducted by constitutional bodies, demand the highest standards of transparency, predictability, and fairness. The syllabus and examination pattern form the foundation of any serious preparation strategy. Without these essential components, aspirants are left to rely on speculation, unofficial sources, or outdated materials, which ultimately places them at a disadvantage.
It is pertinent to note that for other posts under the Common Group A & B (Technical) Examination, the commission has already uploaded detailed syllabi. However, the absence of similar clarity for FAO and STO creates an uneven playing field among candidates of different streams. Finance and accounts-related posts require specialised preparation. A clearly defined syllabus is indispensable for structured and focused study.
Moreover, aspirants preparing for these posts often balance employment, professional courses, or other competitive examinations. In such circumstances, timely notification is not merely an administrative formality but a matter of equity and procedural fairness. Advance clarity helps candidates plan their preparation, select appropriate study materials, and manage time efficiently.
Past experiences in certain examinations, where syllabus notifications were delayed, caused confusion and avoidable stress among candidates. Such situations can inadvertently undermine confidence in the examination process. The commission, being a constitutional authority entrusted with upholding meritocracy, must ensure that uncertainty does not overshadow its otherwise credible functioning.
In the spirit of constructive engagement, it is earnestly requested that the commission clarify at the earliest whether:
- The earlier syllabus and examination pattern for FAO and STO will continue unchanged; or
- A revised syllabus and updated examination scheme are under consideration.
If any revision is proposed, a reasonable preparatory window should be provided to maintain fairness and equal opportunity.
Clear communication will not only benefit aspirants but also strengthen institutional trust in the examination system. Transparency today will prevent confusion tomorrow.
It is hoped that the commission will take timely action in the larger interest of candidates and administrative propriety.
A concerned aspirant